USPTO serial 77241005
KLASSY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KLASSY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mathew J. Temmerman
Mathew J. Temmerman TEMMERMAN LAW OFFICE423 E STDAVIS, CA 95616-4132UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely shirts, pants, shoes, trousers, jeans, jackets, coats, sweaters, shorts, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts, sweatsuits, sweatshorts, jogging suits, tracksuits, tee shirts, tank tops, denims, skirts, dresses | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |