CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PAGII

USPTO serial 77241771

PAGII

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAGII?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Willsey

Peter J. Willsey Cooley Godward Kronish LLP777 6th St., N.W., Suite 1100Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing on-line communication tools, namely, instant messaging, e-mail, e-mail notification alerts, chat rooms, forums and bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users in the field of general interest, all via electronic communications networks; providing telecommunication connections to the Internet for use in broadcasting of text, audio, images, video and graphic works; broadcasting services for text, audio, images, video and graphic worksACTIVE—
041Digital video, audio and multimedia publishing servicesACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software that enables users to create and modify web sites and web pages, and to upload and download digital content to and from web sites and web pages; computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining the web sites of othersACTIVE—
045Providing social networking services via the Internet and wireless communication devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 9, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 12, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance