USPTO serial 77241911
MADE BY GOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3951127Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2011
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MADE BY GOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Temporary tattoos ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 23, 2007 |
| 024 | [ Textile labels ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2007 |
| 025 | Bras; Sports bra; Panties; Panties, shorts and briefs; Shorts; Shirts; Sport shirts; Sports shirts; T-shirts; Cloth bibs; Infant wear; Straps for bras; Sweat shorts; Pants; Textile diapers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gross III, Arthur
- Other trademarks owned by Gross III, Arthur
- Other trademarks owned by Gross III, Arthur
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MADE BY GOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 26, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |