USPTO serial 77242129
HERBALSCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERBALSCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Whitelaw
JENNIFER L. WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRL N FL 3NAPLES, FL 34103-3590UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals; botanical extracts for use in the manufacture of medical, veterinary, pharmaceutical and nutraceutical products; botanical extracts used in the manufacture of preparations in the form of medicated lotions, non-medicated lotions, medicated creams, non-medicated creams, and topical analgesics and anesthetics, tablets, capsules, pills, tincture, non-medicated suppositories, medicated suppositories and ampule for injection; botanical extracts, herbal extracts and flavor extracts, all for use in the manufacture of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Fragrances for personal use; food flavorings prepared from essential oils; personal care products, namely, mouthwashes, non-medicated mouth rinse, and pre-moistened non-medicated personal hygiene wipes, namely, herpes relief wipes; and herbal extracts for cosmetic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Functional foods, namely, dairy-based food beverages, fruit-based food beverages, vegetable-based food beverages, dairy-based chocolate food beverages, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute,vegetable-based chocolate food beverages, nut-based food beverages, milk, milk beverages containing fruits, milk beverages with high milk content, milk based beverages containing fruit juice, and milk beverages containing coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Functional foods, namely, chocolate, dairy-free chocolate, reduced fat chocolate, reduced calorie chocolate, cocoa, chocolate chips, chocolate fondue, chocolate toppings, reduced fat candy, bakery products, namely, cookies, cakes, pies and muffins, crackers, biscuits, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, pretzels, chewing gum, frozen yogurt, frozen custard, fruit ices, pancake, waffle and bread mixes, salad dressing, pasta and packaged meal mixes consisting primarily of pasta, rice, cornmeal and wheat based snack foods, bread, breakfast cereals; functional beverages, namely, grain based food beverages containing oats or oat extracts, herbal food beverages; food beverages, namely, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, and grain-based food beverages; and food flavorings; botanical extracts and herbal extracts for non-medical purposes for use as flavorings in foods for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Functional beverages, namely, fruit drinks, soft drinks, drinking water and fruit and vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and pharmaceutical research in the field of biodefense; and research and development in the field of biodefense related to pharmaceutical preparations, vaccines, and medicines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Singapore Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by HerbalScience Singapore Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HERBALSCIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |