USPTO serial 77242245
NIPPON SHOKKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIPPON SHOKKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Imabari-shi, Ehime-ken, JP
Imabari-shi, Ehime-ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Neuner
GEORGE W. NEUNER EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLPF.D.R. STATIONP.O. BOX 130NEW YORK, NY 10150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fresh, chilled or frozen meat for human consumption; fresh, chilled or frozen edible fish, seafood and shellfish, processed meats, namely, beef, chicken, veal, ham, turkey and pork, processed fish and fish roe, processed vegetables and fruits, frozen fruits, frozen vegetables, eggs, processed eggs, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt, edible oils and fats; dried flakes of laver for sprinkling on rice in hot water; proteins being foodstuffs for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Seasonings, spices, processed cereals, cereal based snack food, Chinese stuffed dumplings, sandwiches, Chinese steamed dumplings, sushi, fried balls of batter mix with small pieces of octopus, steamed buns stuffed with minces meat, prepared hamburger sandwiches, prepared pizzas, prepared box meals consisting primarily of rice or pasta, prepared hot dog sandwiches, prepared meat pies, prepared ravioli; confectionery, namely, crystal sugar pieces, frozen yogurt, honey, bread and buns; instant confectionery mixes, namely, frozen yogurt mixes, instant jelly mixes, instant doughnut mixes, instant pudding mixes, instant pancake mixes, ice cream mixes, sherbet mixes; curry, stew and soup mixes; seasoned powder for sprinkling on rice, namely, furikake; Japanese traditional confectionery, namely, chestnuts roasted with syrup, sugared beans, starch-based candies, rice dumplings dressed with sweet bean jam, cakes of sugar bounded millet, fried dough cookies, soft pin-rolled cakes of pounded rice, crystal sugar pieces, sweet soup of adzuki-bean flour, sweet soup of adzuki beans with rice cake, sweet dumplings, sweet bean jam coated with sugared bean based soft shells, glutinous starch syrup, boiled beans in sugar syrup, agar gel cubes in sugar syrup, steamed cakes, sweet pounded rice cakes, bean jam-filled wafers, pastry shells for bean jam-filled wafers, sweetened boiled adzuki beans, bars of sweet jellied bean paste, dried sugared cakes of rice flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nihon Shokken Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Nihon Shokken Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NIPPON SHOKKEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |