USPTO serial 77242341
SHIV KHERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIV KHERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Delhi, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Dunn
THOMAS F DUNN MORSE & BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON PCCITY POINT230 THIRD AVENUE 4TH FLOORWALTHAM, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | SERIES OF BOOKS, WORKBOOKS, PAMPHLETS, NEWSLETTERS, BOOKLETS, AND OTHER PRINTED PERIODICALS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF INSPIRATIONAL, MOTIVATIONAL, AND OTHER METHODS OF ACHIEVING PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS; GREETING CARDS; ADDRESS BOOKS; DIARIES; POSTERS; PENS; BLANK WRITING JOURNALS; WRITING PADS; PHOTOGRAPHS; STATIONERY; PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL IN THE FIELD OF INSPIRATIONAL, MOTIVATIONAL, AND OTHER METHODS OF ACHIEVING PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS; PRINTED MATTER IN THE NATURE OF NEWSLETTERS, BROCHURES, BOOKS, HANDBOOKS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF INSPIRATIONAL, MOTIVATIONAL, AND OTHER METHODS OF ACHIEVING PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |