USPTO serial 77243196
EAT LIKE A MILLIONAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAT LIKE A MILLIONAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Smugler
JACK SMUGLER JACK SMUGLER LAW OFFICE240 HOLMWOOD AVENUEOTTAWA, ON, K1S2P9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | (1) Publications and electronic publications in the field of cooking, namely, books, e-books, web-based publications, articles, and newsletters; pre-recorded audio CDs containing music and voice recordings in the field of cooking; pre-recorded video DVDs containing music and voice recordings in the field of cooking; digital and web-based voice and video recordings, namely, Podcasts, in the field of cooking. (2) Promotional materials, namely, aprons, cloth shopping bags, tote bags, carry-all bags, and purses, baseball caps, coffee mugs, clocks, calendars, postcards, mouse pads, stickers, fridge magnets, novelty buttons, and clothing, namely, adult clothing, children's clothing, and infant clothing, namely, sportswear, athletic wear, exercise wear, beach wear, sleepwear, undergarments, loungewear, formal wear, and outer wear. (3) Household utensils, namely, kitchen utensils and household appliances, namely, small electric kitchen appliances. (4) Condiments, namely, chutneys, honeys, jams, mayonnaises, mustards, nut butters and spreads, compotes and confits, relishes, salad dressings, gourmet salt, gourmet pepper, flavored cooking oils, and flavored cooking vinegars. (5) Educational services, namely, cooking demonstrations and classes, and seminars concerning food, cooking, and food preparation techniques and methods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |