USPTO serial 77243264
IDATASTORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IDATASTORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Brouillette
Robert Brouillette BROUILLETTE LEGAL INC.1050 COTE DU BEAVER HALL, SUITE 1500MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H2Z0A5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Remote starters for motors and engines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Interface device used in the installation of remote starters and security systems, namely, data interface device adapted to communicate with an automobile's computer through a computer data port, the device also adapted to receive a signal transmission from another device which signal controls one or more automobile functions, useful for automobile door lock/unlock, trunk release, and engine start/disable | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring remote starters for motors and engines, security systems and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTOMOTIVE DATA SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AUTOMOTIVE DATA SOLUTIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named IDATASTORE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |