USPTO serial 77243621
SWS APPROVED!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3895827Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2010
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWS APPROVED!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CA
Niagara Falls, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
STACEY R. HALPERN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614-7216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services featuring safety-warning lights for automobiles, industry, construction vehicles, locomotives, aircraft, ships and navigation equipment, namely, strobe lights, rotating lights and bar lights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of automotive, industrial, construction, locomotive, aviation, navigation and marine safety/warning lights | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWS WARNING SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWS WARNING SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWS WARNING SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWS Star Warning Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SWS APPROVED!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |