USPTO serial 77244058
SYNERKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNERKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yavne 81104, IL
Yavne 81104, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline Zion
Jacqueline Zion Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, LLP1500 Broadway, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | GOODS OF METAL AND PREDOMINANTLY OF METAL, NAMELY, LOCKS, SECURITY LOCKS AND LOCK GOODS, NAMELY, LOCK CASES, LOCK CYLINDERS, STRIKING PLATES, KEYS AND KEY BLANKS, BOLTS, LOCK BOLTS, DOOR BOLTS, MORTISE LOCKS, PADLOCKS, PADLOCK HASPS, SAFETY CHAINS, KEY RINGS, STRIKE BOXES, IDENTITY PLATES, KING-PIN LOCKS, TRAILER HITCH LOCKS, SHIPMENT CONTAINER LOCKS, METAL SAFES AND METAL COMPONENTS OF SAFES, NAMELY, FRAMES, HINGES AND HANDLES, MECHANICAL NON-ELECTRIC DOOR CLOSERS, EMERGENCY AND PANIC DEVICES FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS, NAMELY, METAL LATCH BARS, METAL LATCHES, METAL PUSH BARS, AND METAL LATCH ASSEMBLIES THAT RELEASE UPON APPLICATION OF FORCE; SMALL ITEMS OF METAL HARDWARE, NAMELY, BOLTS, HINGES, NON-ELECTRIC, NON-HYDRAULIC SPRING DOOR RETURN DEVICES, NAMELY, DOOR CLOSERS AND DOOR KNOCKERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMECHANICAL LOCKS AND LOCK GOODS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC LOCK CYLINDERS, ELECTRIC STRIKING PLATES, DOOR MAGNETS, ELECTRONIC KEYS, KEY CARDS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC OR MAGNETIC ACCESS CONTROL CARDS AND BLANK SMART CARDS, CODED TO LOCK KEY INFORMATION SMART CARDS, AND KEY CARD READERS; ELECTRONIC OR MAGNETIC ACCESS CONTROL CARD READERS AND SMART CARD READERS; UNITS FOR PROGRAMMING LOCKS, LOCK CYLINDERS, KEYS, KEY CARDS AND KEY CARD READERS, NAMELY, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS FOR PROGRAMMING LOCKS, LOCK CYLINDERS, KEYS, KEY CARDS, AND KEY CARD READERS; ELECTRON MECHANICAL AND ELECTRON HYDRAULIC DOOR OPENERS, DOOR CLOSERS AND DOOR OPERATORS; ELECTRIC AND ELECTRON MECHANICAL DOOR AND WINDOW HARDWARE, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC DOOR AND WINDOW OPENERS; ELECTRONIC AND MAGNETIC SENSORS, NAMELY, PROXIMITY SENSORS, PRESSURE SENSORS, CONTACT SENSORS, MAGNETIC SENSORS; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR SIGNALING AND CHECKING, NAMELY, SENSORS FOR CHECKING AND/OR CONTROLLING PEOPLE'S MOVEMENTS WITHIN, ENTRANCE TO AND EXIT FROM BUILDINGS AND THROUGH DOORS AND GATES AND/OR FOR USE WITH LOCKS; MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC IDENTITY CARDS; BLANK AND CODED TO LOCK/KEY INFORMATION MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR MANAGEMENT OF KEYING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |