USPTO serial 77244266
TRIPLE PRIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIPLE PRIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle S. Roth
GABRIELLE S. ROTH DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |