USPTO serial 77244311
U.R BEAUTIFUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U.R BEAUTIFUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
NORM J. RICH FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; non-medicated and unscented toiletries and toilet preparations, namely, soaps, creams, gels and lotions, all unscented and all for the care of the skin and body; deodorants; anti-perspirants; preparations for the care of the hair; shampoo; suntanning and sunscreening preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring perfumes, cosmetics, toiletries and hair-care preparations; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, enabling customers conveniently to view and purchase those goods in a department store or high street stand-alone retail store selling lifestyle goods in the field of perfumes, cosmetics, toiletries and hair-care preparations; whole distributorships, wholesale ordering, wholesale stores, all of the aforementioned services relating to perfumes, cosmetics, toiletries and hair-care preparations; mail, on-line, telephone and all other communication ordering services, namely, catalog ordering services relating to perfumes, cosmetics, toiletries and hair-care preparations; compilation of mailing lists; direct mail advertising, business advisory and business management services; advertising services; business merchandising display services, window display arrangement services for merchandise; publicity services, namely, public relations; marketing and promotional services; market analysis and research; import/export agency services; procurement, namely, purchasing perfumes and cosmetics for others; window dressing, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Provision of beauty, perfumery, make-up, skin treatment and hair care services, namely, beauty salons, services of a make-up artist, skin care salons, hair stylizing, hair cutting, all provided at counters, salons and advisory centres; advisory services relating to all the aforesaid; arranging and providing facilities for beauty, perfumery, make-up, skin treatment and hairdressing demonstrations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Urban Retreat Ventures Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Urban Retreat Ventures Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named U.R BEAUTIFUL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |