Drawing for ARKENSTONE

USPTO serial 77244442

ARKENSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARKENSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Grow

Michael A. Grow Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Ankle bracelets; body piercing jewelry; body piercing rings; body piercing studs; bracelets; brooches; charms; charm bracelets; identification bracelets; chokers; clocks; collectible coins; commemorative coins; costume jewelry; earrings; precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes, namely, collectible figurines and figurines incorporated into settings; figures of precious metal; figurines of precious metal; holiday ornaments of precious metal; jewelry; jewelry boxes of precious metal; jewelry chains; key chains of precious metal; lapel pins; medallions; necklaces; non-monetary coins; ornamental lapel pins; ornamental pins; ornaments of precious metal; pendants; pins being jewelry; precious stones; rings being jewelry; sculptures made of precious metal; semi-precious gemstones; shoe ornaments of precious metal; wedding bands; wrist watches; jewelry boxes not of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 5, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 29, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance