Drawing for YURBOOK.COM

USPTO serial 77244595

YURBOOK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with YURBOOK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Vana

JAMES L. VANA PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of school yearbooks; downloadable electronic files in the nature of school yearbook materials, namely, data, audio, video, text and images; electronic publications, namely, school yearbooks, recorded on computer mediaACTIVE—
016(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) School yearbooks in print formACTIVE—
035(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Providing online retail store services featuring school yearbooksACTIVE—
038(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Providing online access to electronic databases in the field of school yearbooksACTIVE—
041(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Providing online, non-downloadable electronic school yearbooksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 31, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 14, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 21, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 13, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance