USPTO serial 77244753
O.MOBI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O.MOBI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications equipment, namely, portable and handheld wireless devices for transmitting, receiving, storing, organizing, manipulating and reviewing voice, images, text, data, video and audio files, namely, cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants; batteries for cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants; chargers for batteries for cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants; carrying cases for cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants; carrying clips for cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants; hands-free devices for cellular telephone handsets and personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 2009 |
| 038 | Cellular telephone services, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video, and information via cellular telephone and global communication networks, pre-paid cellular telephone services; cellular based electronic mail services; cellular based voice and text messaging services; cellular long distance communication services | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |