USPTO serial 77244895
GUIDANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUIDANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
Perry J. Viscounty LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DRSuite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing vendor management services for others, namely, the monitoring, evaluating, and analyzing the performance of employee placement and staffing programs; staff management, namely, providing human resources management services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Services Group Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Corporate Services Group Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GUIDANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 18, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |