USPTO serial 77245086
GREENUV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3600472Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREENUV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Himich
Matthew J. Himich Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT CURING AND DRYING SYSTEM COMPRISED OF ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLS, THE FOREGOING USED TO CURE AND DRY INKS, VARNISHES, ADHESIVES, AND THE LIKE, AND NOT FOR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 14, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |