USPTO serial 77245443
BRIGHTCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRIGHTCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
WILLIAM J. SEITER SEITER & CO.220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402-2500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | webcams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |