USPTO serial 77245683
REDEFINING WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDEFINING WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John T. Whelan
JOHN T. WHELAN THE LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. WHELAN, LLC135 W DARES BEACH RDSTE 204PRINCE FREDERICK, MD 20678-3127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communications apparatus and instruments, namely, wireless communication handsets and other electronic units for the wireless reception and transmission of communication signals over terrestrial and satellite-based communications links, namely, cell phones and wireless telephony apparatus; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; electronic telecommunications computer hardware used in terrestrial and satellite-based telecommunications, namely, base stations and base station controllers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission and reception of data by electronic communication networks, namely, transmission and reception of voice, video, data, multi-media, and documents via satellite, terrestrial and wireless telecommunications, computers, computer networks, and the Internet; telecommunications gateway services, namely, base station services and base station controller services; electronic transmission and reception of messages and data; telecommunications backhaul services, namely, telecommunications routing and junction services, and transmission of routing data for use in analyzing or selecting routing paths to manage communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SKYTERRA LP
- Other trademarks owned by Mobile Satellite Ventures LP
- Other trademarks owned by Mobile Satellite Ventures LP
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named REDEFINING WIRELESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |