Drawing for AIR VALET

USPTO serial 77246455

AIR VALET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3785198Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 4, 2010
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AIR VALET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

Claudia A. Smith WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASTrademark DepartmentNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, servicing and repair of coin or credit card activated tire inflation machines, vacuum machines for the inside of vehicles and water dispensing machines for servicing vehicle engines, namely, maintaining engine components; operation, namely, the rental, installation and maintenance, of coin or credit card activated tire inflation machines, vacuum machines for the inside of vehicles and water dispensing machines for servicing vehicle engines, namely, maintaining engine componentsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDNov 7, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 11, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
May 20, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 4, 2019REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 10, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jul 9, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 4, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 2, 2016E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
May 22, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 4, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 1, 2010SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED
Mar 31, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 25, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
Mar 1, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 4, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 4, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 5, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 15, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 20, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2007CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Dec 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 30, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Nov 30, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance