USPTO serial 77247681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina N. Rubke, Esq.
Cristina N. Rubke, Esq. Shartsis Friese LLPOne Maritime Plaza, 18th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power-operated table saws, power-operated band saws, power-operated jointers and wood joining machines, namely, thickness planers, wood planing machines, 15-inch and 20-inch electric planers, power-operated planers, power operated planer-jointers, drill presses with 17-inch swing and grinders with 8 inch and 10 inch diameter wheels, namely, power-operated grinding wheels, power-operated tools in the nature of grinders and mortisers, namely, wood-working machines in the nature of hollow chisel mortisers; dust collectors, namely, vacuum cleaners for industrial wood-working chip removal purposes, dust collectors as structural parts of wood-working machines and other dust producing power tools, power-operated lathes, shapers, namely, wood-working machines in the nature of spindle shapers, wood-working machines in the nature of wood turning lathes, abrasive machines, namely, oscillating spindle sanders, oscillating edge sanders, powered dual drum sanders, nonclamping accessories for use with wood-working machinery, namely, carbide tipped saw blades for use with power-operated table saws, power saw blades, air suction machines in the nature of dust and chip extractors specifically designed for wood-working machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 009 | Non-clamping accessories for use with wood-working machinery, namely, laser devices for projecting a visible line on a work piece to be drilled by a drill press | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
| 011 | Dust collectors and air cleaners, namely, ambient air cleaning units, air filtering installations, air purifying apparatus and machines, air filters for industrial applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 22, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |