USPTO serial 77247715
EMSENSE ENABLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMSENSE ENABLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Gregory, Jr.
Richard L. Gregory, Jr. Gregory & Martensen LLP2018 Bissonnet StreetHouston, TX 77005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of computer devices and systems for others in the fields of psychophysiological interface devices for monitoring the cognitive response of individuals and groups to stimuli including, for example, advertising, political messaging, and video gaming, computer input devices, biometric feedback devices; consulting services, namely, design and development of computer hardware and software architecture for human-computer interfaces; technical support services, namely, hardware and software troubleshooting support for psychophysiological interface devices for monitoring cognitive response of individuals and groups to stimuli including, for example, advertising, political messaging, and video gaming, computer input devices, and biometric feedback devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |