Drawing for MADDY

USPTO serial 77247737

MADDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Foundation garments; panties; brassieres; underwear; briefs; body briefers; body suits; shapewear, namely, girdles and camisoles; women's intimate apparel, namely, women's undergarments, lingerie, bustiers, bandeaux, corsets, corselettes, panti-girdles and slipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 26, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 6, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance