USPTO serial 77247766
TAN 24-7 SALON CONSULTANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAN 24-7 SALON CONSULTANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint George, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron D. Randall
AARON D. RANDALL HUGHES, THOMPSON, RANDALL & MELLEN187 N 100 WSAINT GEORGE, UT 84770-2803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-sun lotions; Beauty lotions; Body lotion; Body lotions; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Face and body lotions; Facial lotion; Hand lotions; Lotions for face and body care; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin lotion; Skin lotions; Sun care lotions; Sun tan lotion; Sun tan gel; Sun tan oil; Suntan creams; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils cosmetics; Tanning creams; Tanning gels; Tanning milks; Tanning oils | ACTIVE | May 22, 2007 |
| 044 | Skin tanning service for humans for cosmetic purposes; Tanning salons | ACTIVE | May 22, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |