USPTO serial 77247796
GEOMATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3878395Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2010
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEOMATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hani Z. Sayed
Hani Z. Sayed RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP611 ANTON BLVD 14TH FLCOSTA MESA, CA 92626-7681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting in natural resource management, namely, natural resource damage assessment and natural resources environmental review and environmental impact analysis, residuals management, namely, habitat restoration, Environmental Impact Studies (EIRs), implementation of residuals management systems, economic impact analysis, water supply and basin management, energy efficiency | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 1985 |
| 037 | Consulting services in the field of construction management, real estate development and dredging and sediment management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 1985 |
| 040 | Consulting services in the field of environmental remediation services, namely, concerning soil and groundwater treatment and treatment of waste water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 1985 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the fields of atmospheric sciences, computational modeling, due diligence, namely, air dispersion modeling, air monitoring, noise abatement, geochemistry and sedimentary geology, earthquake engineering, engineering design, expert elicitation, namely, probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA), geotechnical investigation, value modeling, facilitated decision making, namely, decision analysis, fish and wildlife habitats assessment and restoration, namely, conducting tests and analysis of habitat conditions to determine ability of habitats to support healthy fish and wildlife populations, and rehabilitation of impaired habitats, geotechnical engineering and engineering geology, geographic information system spatial analysis and visualization, groundwater modeling engineering, hazard analysis, namely, remote sensing, data integration and management, data visualization, geologic studies, integrated risk management, namely, PSHA, performance assessment, resource and process optimization, namely, process engineering, risk assessment and toxicology, namely, geotechnical investigations, seismic hazard assessment, storm water engineering and site investigations, permitting and monitoring, wetlands and water quality assessment, namely, wetland delineation, mitigation, and monitoring, environmental impact studies; engineering services in the fields of atmospheric science, earthquakes, energy, construction, geotechnical, geology, geographic information system spatial analysis and visualization, groundwater modeling, hazard analysis, natural resource, environmental impact, property development, resource and process optimization, remediation, storm water, and wastewater engineering, wetland mitigation design, toxicology services and site investigation services, namely, geotechnical and earthquake engineering studies, toxicology assessments, design of residuals management systems, wetland mitigation design, namely, industrial wastewater treatment, irrigation management, water treatment systems design; Consulting services in the field of environmental remediation, namely, remediation design; Consulting services in the field of environmental watershed assessment, namely, environmental engineering in the nature of study and analysis for the restoration of habitats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 1985 |
| 045 | Consulting services in the fields of litigation support, Endangered Species Act compliance, compliance, namely, regulatory compliance and RCRA/CERCLA storm water compliance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named GEOMATRIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |