USPTO serial 77249071
ICAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rex A. Donnelly
REX A. DONNELLY RATNERPRESTIA1007 ORANGE STREETSUITE 1100WILMINGTON, DE 19899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical, electronic, and optical systems, apparatus and instruments for vehicles, namely, back-up sensors and cameras; navigation systems, on board computers and computer networking hardware for vehicles; measurement, signal, control and rescue apparatus and instuments for vehicles, namely, vehicle locator and recovery devices; adaptors and connector interfaces in or on vehicles for connecting electrical or electronic apparatus; rescue devices for vehicles, namely, emergency warning lights, emergency signal transmitters; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, converting, storing, regulating, and controlling electric current in vehicles; appartus and systems for recording, transferring and repoducing sound and images in vehicles, namely, computer hardware for telecommunication, telecommunications transmitters, microphones, audio speakers, audio receivers, video receivers, satelite receivers, amplifiers, radios, tape recorders and players, video recorders, video disc players, audio disc players; optical, acoustic and tactile display devices for vehicles, namely, touch panels, touch pads, audio speakers, flat panel display screens, LCD panels, video screens; audio and video systems comprised primarily of audio speakers, speaker housings, flat panel display screens, video disc players, audio disc players, radios, amplifiers, touch panels, electric control panels; fire extinguishers for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles and structural parts therefor; land vehicle parts, namely, doors, bonnets, hatchbacks, loading spaces, soft tops, sunroofs, bumpers, shock absorbers, windows, wheel rims, seats, bench seats, integrated containers, internal linings, door linings, internal upholstery, seat covers, dashboards, dashboard inserts, consoles, steering wheels, gear stick knobs, sun blinds, mirrors, horns, seat belts and air bags, anti-theft devices and warning apparatus, trailer couplings, electric motors, automotive conversion kits comprising structural parts of automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Converting, customizing and retro-fitting land vehicles, land vehicle proto-types, land vehicle structural parts; custom manufacturing of land vehicles and structural parts of land vehicles for others; manufacturing for others in the field of land vehicles; manufacturing for others industrtial equipment, machines, devices and tools for use in land vehicle production facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDAG Engineering & Design AG
- Other trademarks owned by EDAG GMBH & CO. KGAA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ICAR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |