USPTO serial 77249959
XGAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XGAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
BaulkhamHills,2153,NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
BaulkhamHills,2153,NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
BaulkhamHills,2153,NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
BaulkhamHills,2153,NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wayne A. Sivertson
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVENUE SUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration consultancy; business consultancy; business consultancy services relating to the supply of quality management systems; business consultancy to firms; business consultancy to individuals; business consultation; business management and organization consultancy, business management consultancy; business management organization consultancy; business organization consulting; business organization consultancy; business planning consultancy; commercial management consultancy; consultancy relating to business efficiency; consultancy relating to business management; consultancy relating to business organization; consultancy relating to business planning; consultancy relating to business marketing; business management consultancy relating to personnel management, sales promotions, to the establishment and running of businesses, and to the management of personnel; corporate management consultancy; business management consultation; personnel management consultancy; professional business consultancy; strategic business consultancy | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Business training consultancy services; training consultancy in the field of business | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Mark Bragg Family Discretionary Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustee for the Greig Family Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named XGAP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 10, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |