Drawing for ONLINE REWARD EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 77250052

ONLINE REWARD EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONLINE REWARD EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

Christopher J. Schulte Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Administration of employee incentive and customer loyalty reward programs featuring the aggregation, conversion and redemption of incentive and loyalty points and currencyACTIVE—
039Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportationACTIVE—
043Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 20, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 28, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance