USPTO serial 77250087
ADAM TUCKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADAM TUCKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps; perfumery, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; pre-shave lotion, after shave lotion, shaving cream, lotion, gel and foam, after shave cream and emulsion, skin moisture lotion, emulsion and cream, deodorants for personal use; deodorant and anti-perspirant cream, talc, sticks and lotions, also in the form of atomizers and roll-on devices, spray talc, body cream and lotion, hand cream, non-medicated hand balm, massage cream, gel and oil, non-medicinal mouthwash, hair care preparations, toothpaste, non-medicated mouthwashes; toiletries, namely, facial cleansers, facial moisturizers, face creams, face lotions, face gels, eye creams, eye gels, eye makeup remover, facial makeup remover, cleansing lotions, cleansing creams, cleansing gels, non-medicated anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels, non-medicated skin repair creams, lotions and gels, non-medicated skin blemish preparations, facial toner, body gel, body oil, body powder, body toners, body cleansers, non-medicated bath salts, bath powder, bath oil, bath grains, bath gels, facial and body sprays, body washes, skin balancing lotions, creams and gels, facial skin oil controllers, skin firming preparations, eye lotions, non-medicated skin renewal cream, face and body masques, skin refreshers, face and body exfoliating preparations, face and body sunscreens, face and body self-tanning preparations, lip sunscreen preparations, sun tan lotions, after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations, lip balm | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry, bracelets, rings being jewelry, necklaces, earrings, pins being jewelry, costume jewelry, precious metals and precious metal alloys; precious and semi-precious gemstones, jewelry boxes of precious metal; jewelry cases of precious metal; clocks and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Goods made of leather and leather imitations, namely, suitcases, luggage, travel bags, garment bags for travel, shoe bags for travel, toiletry bags sold empty, cosmetic bags sold empty, carry-on bags, purses, handbags, shoulder bags, clutch bags, duffel bags, beach bags, billfolds, wallets, key cases, knapsacks, fanny packs, waist packs, umbrellas, parasols, trunks, backpacks, attaché cases, tote bags, book bags, brief cases, document cases, business cases, all-purpose sports bags, gym bags, athletic bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Tucker Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mark Tucker Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named ADAM TUCKER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |