USPTO serial 77250552
CANNON POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANNON POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Tellerman Berkowitz, Esq.
Deborah Tellerman Berkowitz, Esq. James David Johnson, P.A.401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 130-290Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Money clips; paper goods and printed matter, namely, bumper stickers, printed paper signs, laminated paper signs, decals, writing pads, coloring books, posters, lithographs, note paper; bulletin boards; trading cards; magazines, programs, booklets and books in the field of baseball; wall calendars; book covers; score books; wrapping paper; coasters made of paper; paper gift bags; greeting cards; stationery folders and postcards; paperweights; pens, pencils, letter openers, paper clips, markers, non-electric erasers, non-electric pencil sharpeners; drafting and drawing rulers; calendars; paper stickers; paper napkins; notepads; laminated paper; note paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Leather key chains; luggage, namely, athletic bags, attaché cases, baby back packs, duffel bags, tote bags, billfolds, briefcases, canes, business and credit card cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, garment bags for travel, handbags, purses, key cases, knapsacks, animal carriers and leashes, passport cases, briefcase-type portfolios, drawstring pouches, rucksacks, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, trunks for traveling, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage containers, namely, mugs, plastic water bottles sold empty, porcelain mugs, plastic drinking cups for toddlers, beverage glassware; trash cans; candlesticks not of precious metal; insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans; bottle openers; lunch boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Men's, women's and children's clothing and footwear, namely, coaches caps, wool hats, knitted headwear, baseball caps, visors, headbands, belts, wristbands, shirts, jogging suits, T-shirts, tank tops, pajamas, golf shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, jackets, neckties, cloth bibs, jerseys, night shirts, coats, robes, raincoats, parkas, ponchos, sneakers, shoes, mittens, gloves, scarves, aprons, down jackets, leather jackets, shorts, sweatpants, jeans, pants, socks, underwear, ties, bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances, namely, live performances by a female singer with a band, live performances by musical bands, live performances by a band and live music concerts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amanda Mason Music LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Amanda Mason Music LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CANNON POWER
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |