Drawing for EXPRESS-O

USPTO serial 77253890

EXPRESS-O

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EXPRESS-O?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Russell W. Warnock

RUSSELL W. WARNOCK BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562-6924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, electric coffee makers, espresso makers, electric hot coffee dispensing unit, electric hot water kettles and electric tea pots and replacement parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 16, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 13, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 20, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance