USPTO serial 77255453
TWIN HD DVD DVD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWIN HD DVD DVD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
LISABETH H. COAKLEY HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200TROY, MI 48098-2683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded DVDs featuring various types of audio and visual media, namely, music, movies, drama, cartoons, animation, documentaries, nature, and environmental issues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |