USPTO serial 77255493
EXEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3906103Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2011
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RFID and biometric identification modules, namely, fingerprint recognition readers, RF chip card readers; Electrical controllers, control modules and computer peripherals used to manage access and privileges obtained from the RFID and biometric modules that control building access and entrance thereto and building environment; Security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station, power units with batteries and battery chargers used in relation with low voltage electronic apparatus; Automatization processor, namely, interlinked industrial computer adapted for automating building equipment; Land and cellular communication modules, namely, communications hubs and servers; Terrestrial and cellular communication modules and radio frequency (RF) communication modules, namely, interface data communication modems for transmissions via telephone, cellular, terrestrial and wireless (RF); Environmental control modules, namely, computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Multimedia control units, namely, control units for monitoring control systems that integrate building automation and security services, namely, people, property and premises building access control, intrusion detection, and building energy management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |