USPTO serial 77255674
TOPCODER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TOPCODER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glastonbury, CT
Glastonbury, CT
Indianapolis, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miguel C. Danielson
Miguel C. Danielson Danielson Legal LLCOne Mifflin Place, Suite 400ATTN: TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORCambridge, MA 02138Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and information services; business services, namely, providing an online marketplace for sellers of professional services on a global computer network; promoting special events and conferences for others concerning computer software development, the computer industry, and games and competitions | ACTIVE | Apr 9, 2002 |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Electronic data transmission; On-line document delivery via a global computer network; Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the development of software; Providing on-line communications links which transfer the website user to other local and global web pages; Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the development of software; broadcasting and streaming of video content concerning computer software development, the computer industry, and games and competitions | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of computer software development; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting software design and development competitions; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting competitions in the fields of graphic design, artistic design, user interface design, algorithmic and computational problem-solving, professional service project completion, puzzle solving, and scavenger hunts; arranging and conducting of contests; Entertainment Services, namely, providing a website concerning computer games and competitions in the fields of graphic design, artistic design, user interface design, algorithmic and computational problem-solving, professional service project completion, puzzle solving, and scavenger hunts; Entertainment services, namely, organizing special events and educational conferences concerning computer software development, the computer industry, and games and competitions | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in competitions, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking and improve their talent; Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, websites, and databases in the fields of on-line competitions for the design and development of computer software, graphic design, artistic design, user interface design, on-line competitions for completion of professional services projects, and on-line competitions for algorithmic and computational problem solving, puzzle solving, and scavenger hunts; Application service provider, namely, providing, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, websites, and databases in the fields of scheduling, tracking and fulfilling competitions for the performance of professional service projects, and to identify, source, negotiate and collaborate with, evaluate and provide feedback on participants in professional services projects; consultancy in the field of computer software; custom software development; computer systems analysis; managing computer software programming projects for others; maintenance of computer software for others; updating of computer software for others; integration of computer software systems and networks; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; providing a website concerning computer software development and computer technology | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TopCoder, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TopCoder, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TopCoder, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TOPCODER, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOPCODER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |