Drawing for MOSAIC

USPTO serial 77256754

MOSAIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3968226Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 2011
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOSAIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nelson D. Nolte

CLAUS SCHMITZ815 BROWNELLST LOUIS, MO 63122UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDDec 3, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2015C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 15, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 9, 2015CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2015PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 31, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 17, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 15, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2008RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jul 11, 2008RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance