USPTO serial 77256815
NETAFIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 28, 2009
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NETAFIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan O. Goldsmith
Susan O. Goldsmith McCarter & English, LLPTwo Tower Center Boulevard24th FloorEast Brunswick, NJ 08816Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Systems comprising computerized controllers, field sensors, soil sensors and software applications for electronic and computerized control of irrigation systems; computerized systems comprising computer hardware and software for irrigation management; field sensors for measurement and monitoring of soil moisture, weather conditions and plant condition and behavior; radio systems comprising receivers and transmitters for use in remote access irrigation control; software applications for storing, processing, analyzing, displaying and documenting data regarding soil moisture, weather conditions and plant condition and behavior; software applications and hardware components for controlling frequency and quantity of irrigation; software for irrigation planning; component parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods; electronic and/or computerized fertigation systems comprising field sensors, soil sensors, computer hardware and software; systems comprising computer hardware and software for electronic and computerized control of fertigation systems; systems comprising computer hardware and software for electronic and computerized control of filtering systems; electronic and computerized controllers for irrigation and fertigation; electronic and computerized fertilizer and acid dosing systems for agricultural use comprising flow meters, computer hardware and software; water meters to control water applications and correct flow rates; computerized greenhouse control systems, namely, greenhouse fertigation, irrigation and climate controllers, capable of measuring the plant's physiological needs and climatic conditions; computer programs for greenhouse control; greenhouse fertigation systems comprising water conduction pipes, computer hardware and software, for controlling the concentration of fertilizer solutions by testing drainage water of greenhouses and making corrections in real time; computerized greenhouse irrigation and fertilization dosing units | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Automatic equipment and apparatus for irrigation, namely, irrigation emitters, sprinklers and drippers for sprinkling irrigation, spraying irrigation, and dripper irrigation; dripper irrigation emitters; dripper irrigation systems comprising irrigation lines, water meters and filters; component parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods; filtration systems comprising filters and pressure regulators; fertigation systems comprising fertilizer dozing channels, fertilizer injectors and valves; water and waste water treatment systems, comprising water purification units, water tanks, pumps and conduits; water recycling control systems comprising disinfectant units, pumps, conduits, monitors and control panels; water disinfection systems comprising UV disinfection units, monitors and control panels; component parts, fittings and accessories for the above goods; [ water tanks for sustaining water pressure; ] [ hot water greenhouse heating apparatus and systems comprising boilers, water pipes and a computerized central control unit; hot air greenhouse heating apparatus and systems comprising burners, burner cells and centrifugal blowers; air exchange greenhouse cooling apparatus and systems comprising ventilators and vents; adiabatic greenhouse cooling apparatus and systems comprising water pipes, fog emitters and fans; adiabatic greenhouse cooling apparatus and systems comprising water pipes, wet-pads, pumps and fans; greenhouse ventilation apparatus and systems comprising fans, vents, CO2 generators and control units ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 31, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 15, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 2, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |