USPTO serial 77257283
WAKASHACHIYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAKASHACHIYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nagoya-shi, Aichi, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)
JAMES M. SLATTERY (REG. NO. 28,380) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces for Chinese noodles, soba noodles and udon noodles; spices; noodles, namely dried udon noodles, fresh udon noodles, instant udon noodles, instant udon noodles in cups, pasta, dried pasta, fresh pasta, instant pasta, instant pasta in cups, cooked noodles, cooked pasta, prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |