Drawing for EXPERIMENTAL GAMEPLAY PROJECT

USPTO serial 77259388

EXPERIMENTAL GAMEPLAY PROJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPERIMENTAL GAMEPLAY PROJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer C. Debrow

JENNIFER C. DEBROW GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A.PO BOX 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0906UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH EXTERNAL DISPLAY SCREEN OR MONITOR, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES, VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, AND MOBILE PHONESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 11, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 10, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance