USPTO serial 77260086
SNAP INSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNAP INSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance agencies; insurance brokerage; insurance consultancy; and insurance information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |