USPTO serial 77260310
#TOPUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with #TOPUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia C. Weber
CYNTHIA C. WEBER SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Electronic funds transfer services; payment services, namely, bill payments, advance payments and gift payments; mutual fund brokerage services; money exchange services; home banking services; electronic funds transfer services carried out via a mobile phone network; payment services, namely, bill payments, advance payments and gift payments carried out via a mobile phone network; mutual fund brokerage services carried out via a mobile phone network; money exchange services carried out via a mobile phone network; and home banking services carried out via a mobile phone network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |