USPTO serial 77260610
ORGANICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORGANICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
URSULA B DAY LAW FIRM OF URSULA B DAY708 THIRD AVENUESUITE 1501NEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN CREATING DATABASES, FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT, FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM), FOR DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT (DMS), FOR ENTERPRISE CONTENT MANAGEMENT (ECM), AND FOR COMPUTER TELEPHONY INTEGRATION (CTI); COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT, POSTAL DELIVERY MANAGEMENT, PERSONAL FINANCE MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE AS A SPREAD SHEET AND WORD PROCESSING; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR COMMUNICATION, NAMELY, CONNECTING COMPUTER NETWORK USERS AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, FOR CRYPTOGRAPHY, FOR CREATING DIGITAL SIGNATURE, FOR COST MANAGEMENT, FOR USE AS COST CALCULATORS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE AS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT TOOL; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN INTERFACE, VIEWER AND OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN IMAGING AND ARCHIVING DOCUMENTS; INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER MANUAL PROGRAMS SOLD WITH THE COMPUTER PROGRAM AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Printed computer manuals for computer programs for use in databases, database management, CRM, DMS, ECM, CTI, for use in project management, postal management, personal management, for use as a spreadsheet, word processing, for use in communication, cryptography, digital signature, cost management, cost calculators, for use as software development tool, for use in interface, viewer and optical character recognition, and for use in imaging and archiving | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |