USPTO serial 77261388
BALLANTYNE VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALLANTYNE VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Clements
Gregory N. Clements CLEMENTS BERNARD PLLC1901 Roxborough Road, Suite 250Charlotte, NC 28211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Residential and commercial real estate development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, Cameron M.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, Cameron M.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, Cameron M.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, John W.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, John W.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIS, John W.
- Other trademarks owned by BISSELL, Sara H.
- Other trademarks owned by BISSELL, Sara H.
- Other trademarks owned by BISSELL, Sara H.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BALLANTYNE VILLAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CIID | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED DENIED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 21, 2014 | RCII | REQUEST TO CANCEL INADVERTENTLY ISSUED REGISTRATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |