Drawing for STRONG

USPTO serial 77261414

STRONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold L. Marquis

Harold L. Marquis Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer, Risley, LLP600 Galleria ParkwaySuite 1500Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely fruit punch, flavored natural water, fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and preparations for making beverages, namely fruit punch, flavored natural waters; bottled waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 4, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 18, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Feb 18, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 9, 2009TTBNCASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB—
Dec 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Nov 13, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2008IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance