USPTO serial 77262434
WMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2011
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea L. Calvaruso, Esq.
Andrea L. Calvaruso, Esq. KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting; business consulting and project management; business process re-engineering; business marketing consulting; procurement services, namely, purchasing computer hardware and software for others; providing information in the fields of business management consulting, business consulting; business acquisition and merger consultation; market analysis; business appraisals; [ conducting business and market research surveys; ] business information services in the field of business change management, business process management, business strategic management and planning, and business technology; business management planning; business merger consultation; business networking; conducting business research and surveys; business supervision; commercial and industrial management assistance; economic forecasting and analysis; [ personnel management consultation; ] preparing business reports; arranging and conducting trade shows and conferences in the field of business and business management; providing information in the field of business management, business marketing, business acquisitions and mergers consulting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2020 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 23, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |