Drawing for PTLA

USPTO serial 77262689

PTLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PTLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank P. Presta

FRANK P. PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Asphalt, pitch and polymer, namely, asphalt-based sealants for use on pavement being a synthetic binding preparation for industrial purposes to improve the performance of asphalt/aggregate mixtures used in building constructionACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 24, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 14, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Oct 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 13, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Apr 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Oct 14, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 13, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Oct 13, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
May 4, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
May 4, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALโ€”
Apr 14, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Apr 14, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Oct 13, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Oct 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Dec 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Dec 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Dec 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
Dec 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Dec 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
Dec 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Nov 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Nov 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 13, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVEDโ€”
May 13, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILEDโ€”
May 13, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Apr 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Apr 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Apr 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 4, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Aug 29, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILEDโ€”
Aug 28, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance