USPTO serial 77263410
WAVEJAMMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WAVEJAMMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald A. Gowan
Gerald A. Gowan Gowan Intellectual Property627 Lyons LaneSuite 204Oakville, Ontario, L6J5Z7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio equipment support stands; racks or cabinets for use in the commercial or home music industries, namely, racks and cabinets for amplifiers, electronic audio equipment, or loudspeakers; amplifier support stands; microphone support stands; speaker support stands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |