Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77263577?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77263577. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns WEEK 1 2 3 4?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77263577, the listed owner(s) include: CGH, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 77263577?

Serial number 77263577 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark WEEK 1 2 3 4. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover WEEK 1 2 3 4?

The public record lists International Classes: 016. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77263577

WEEK 1 2 3 4

Q: What is the current status of WEEK 1 2 3 4?

WEEK 1 2 3 4 (77263577) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Aug 24, 2007
Status date: Apr 4, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEEK 1 2 3 4?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

CGH, Inc.
Spring Park, MN
Other trademarks owned by CGH, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Schumann

MICHAEL D. SCHUMANN HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C.P.O. BOX 2902MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
016	Coupon mailers and coupon templates for making coupon mailers featuring advertising for others to promote their goods and services	ACTIVE	Aug 21, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
May 19, 2011	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 19, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 4, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 4, 2011	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Apr 4, 2011	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Jul 12, 2010	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jul 12, 2010	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2010	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 16, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 14, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 29, 2009	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 26, 2009	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jun 12, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 11, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 9, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 8, 2009	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Dec 8, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 4, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 4, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 3, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 3, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 29, 2007	MDSM	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Aug 28, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—