USPTO serial 77263769
ROYAL HERITAGE COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL HERITAGE COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Air mattresses for use when camping; Futon mattresses; Inflatable mattresses for use when camping; Mattress cushions; Mattress foundations; Mattress toppers; Mattresses; Mattresses made of flexible wood; Sleep products, namely, mattresses, spring mattresses, box springs and mattress foundations; Bath pillows; Head supporting pillows; Inflatable pillows; Maternity pillows; Neck-supporting pillows; Nursing pillows; Pillow-like device comprising plastic core, fabric, and cushion material to be worn on arm or leg while sleeping or at rest; Pillows; Cribs; Nap mats; Extendible sofas; Sleeper sofas; Sofa beds; Sofas; Couches; Bedroom furniture; Dining chairs; Dining room tables; Dining tables; Living room furniture; Room dividers; Beauty salon furniture, namely, shampoo bowls; Beauty salon furniture, namely, shampoo stations; Beauty salon furniture, namely, styling stations; Bumper guards for furniture; Cabinets; Carpet coasters for protecting furniture legs; Cast stone household and garden furniture; Computer furniture; Cushions; Dinner wagons; Entertainment centers; Fitted fabric furniture covers; Fitted furniture cover not of fabric; Furniture; Furniture chests; Furniture for camping; Furniture for displaying goods; Furniture for house, office and garden; Furniture frames; Furniture, namely, display units; Furniture, namely, dressers; Furniture, namely, wall units; Furniture, namely, wardrobes; Indoor window blinds; Kitchen furniture, namely, ready to assemble mobile kitchen islands; Lawn furniture; Mirrors; Office furniture; Outdoor furniture; Plastic furniture for gardens; Recliners; Screens; Seating furniture; Seats; Stone furniture; Tables; Towel closets; Washstands; Chair beds; Chair cushions; Chair pads; Chairs; Deck chairs; Easy-chairs; Lounge chairs; Lounge chairs for cosmetic treatments; Office chairs; Reclining chairs; Rocking chairs; Ottomans; Dressers; Dressing tables; Tea tables; Three-mirror dressing tables; Trestle tables | ACTIVE | Feb 9, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |