Drawing for TASTEBOOK

USPTO serial 77264122

TASTEBOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TASTEBOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Hughes

JOHN A. HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTRFL 8SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3833

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pamphlets, magazines and newsletter in the fields of wine, other alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, travel, hotels, and restaurants, home decoration and gardeningACTIVE—
039Providing an internet web site in the field of travel, and lists of required items thereforACTIVE—
041Providing on-line courses of instruction in the fields of cooking and food recipies, wine and other alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, travel, hotels, restaurants, home decoration and gardening, and lists of required items for each of the forgoingACTIVE—
042Providing an internet web site in the field of home decoration, and lists of required items thereforACTIVE—
043Providing an Internet web site in the field of hotels and restaurants and providing information about the characteristics of wine, other alcoholic drinks and non-alcoholic drinksACTIVE—
044Providing an internet web site in the field of gardening, and lists of required items thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 23, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 20, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance