USPTO serial 77265982
SUPERSTICKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERSTICKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D. FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bath sandals; Bath slippers; Beach shoes; Boot uppers; Boots; Boots for sports; Iron fittings for boots; Ski boots; Welts for boots; Esparto shoes or sandals; Fittings of metal for shoes and boots; Football boots; Studs for Football boots; Football shoes; Studs for Football shoes; Footwear; Tips for footwear; Footwear uppers; Gaiter straps; Gaiters; Galoshes; Gymnastic shoes; Half-boots; Heelpieces for boots and shoes; Heels; Inner soles; Lace boots; Non-slipping devices for boots and shoes; Sandals; Shoes; Iron fittings for shoes; Welts for shoes; Slippers; Soles for footwear; Sports shoes; Wooden shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |